Kindle version of the novel now at 99 cents

“I’ve long considered Michael and Jeff Shaara’s Civil War trilogy to be one of the benchmarks for Civil War historical fiction. Knoxville 1863 came very close to that mark.” –Jim Chambers for Red Adept Reviews

The eBook version of Knoxville 1863 is now available for the Amazon Kindle at only 99 cents a copy. It was professionally edited, proofread to eliminate  misspellings, typos and other annoying errors, and it has a map and a linked table of contents. A paperback version also is available for $7.98 here.

Posted in "Knoxville 1863", Instapundit Plug | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Reprise: French seams

Some slaves/servants were highly-skilled domestic craftsmen. The novel’s widow Parthenia Leila Ellis’s housekeeper/slave Natalie, for instance. Natalie was skilled at sewing French seams even in silk, while her mistress was afraid of sewing silk at all.

The French seam remains in use because it is a deft way of concealing raw edges of cloth. It is sometimes used on the outside of dresses and other garments. Natalie’s skill was one reason Leila Ellis hoped to employ her for wages after Emancipation took effect in Tennessee.

Posted in Civil War clothing, Parthenia Leila Ellis, Slavery | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Boy Battery’s experience shows Longstreet’s incompetence

Captain/Doctor William Watts Parker’s famous “boy battery” plays a prominent role in the novel, because its position on Cherokee Heights gives a literal overview of the battlefield.

But also because the battery’s almost-incredible experience of being shuffled back and forth across a freezing river dramatically illuminates General Longstreet’s incompetence, probably one reason the general’s supporters would rather not discuss the Battle of Fort Sanders.

Sergeant Pitchigru Pease and most of the rest of my battery characters, of course, were fiction. But most of the details of the battery’s role in the battle are taken from historian Robert K. Krick’s excellent research.

The battery’s survivors were among the last Confederates to be released from federal captivity after surrendering at Sayler’s Creek three days before the rest of the army surrendered at Appomattox.

The Sayler’s Creek captives were marched (some were so weak from lack of food they had to be dragged by their comrades, according to Krick) back to Petersburg. They were crowded onto filthy transports and taken, without food or water, north to Federal prisons. Krick found that some of them died on the way.

Many were taken to the Union hellhole in Maryland called Point Lookout. The subsequent assassination of President Lincoln would add to their problems and delay their release until July.

At least one member of the battery was offered the chance to go home if he would simply take the oath of allegiance to the United States. But, Krick found, he “steadfastly refused to comply.”

Posted in "Knoxville 1863", Boy Battery, Gen. Danville Leadbetter, Gen. James Longstreet | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Reprise: The U.S. Colored Troops

Soldiering Freedmen are a small part of the novel because they didn’t fight in the Battle of Fort Sanders, but were only on garrison guard duty. Particularly around the Knoxville jail, Castle Fox, which held some Confederate prisoners.

But whereas the U.S. Colored Troops were controversial in some parts of the North and certainly most places in the South, there was apparently good feeling for them in parts of East Tennessee, as related in this 1888 history of their part in the war. When Union army officials sought in 1864 to raise a black regiment of heavy artillery from the Knoxville-Chattanooga area, they found ready support among white Union troops:

“The officers and men of the Ninth Artillery Corps,” wrote Lieutenant Colonel Thomas J. Morgan, of the Fourteenth United States Colored Troops stationed at Galatin, TN, look with favor upon it and many excellent men are asking positions in the regiments now being formed. Commissioned officers of old regiments are asking to be transferred with same rank from white regiments to the black ones.”

Via Civil War Memory.

Posted in Slavery, United States Colored Troops | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A Visit From the Old Mistress

Winslow_Homer_-_A_Visit_from_the_Old_Mistress_-_Google_Art_ProjectThis poignant 1876 painting by Winslow Homer is rarely seen except in art gallery presentations. The Smithsonian’s collection interprets it this way:

“…the living conditions of these former slaves would appear not to have improved since before the time of the Civil War. Their dwelling is humble, and their homespun clothing is shabby. Yet the relationship between them and their former mistress is very different. The mistress clearly assumes the stature of a guest in the home of others. She now stands while one of her former servants sits in a chair. Homer caught the awkward tension of these women whose years of forced bondage never fostered in them a sense of loyalty or affection for their former overseer.”

It was not necessarily so with my fictional mistress Parthenia Leila Ellis of the novel. She had only two slaves to manage, a pair of husband-and-wife house servants named Brutus and Natalie. They lived in the house with her, not in separate quarters, and being house slaves they dressed better than these, presumably field slaves, did.

Yet the relationship between them and the widow Ellis might have been equally awkward after the war. Leila hoped she could afford enough in wages to entice them to stay on as employees, but I leave it to the reader of the novel to decide whether they did.

Posted in Parthenia Leila Ellis, Slavery | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Reprise: Corporal Watkins at Fort Sanders

John Watkins, of the Nineteenth Ohio Battery, which was held in reserve during the fight, survived the war and attended a Knoxville reunion in 1895. He saw the beginning of the end of the red-clay fort and wrote home about it:

“Went to Fort Sanders, looked the place over and talked with old soldiers and some other people about it, but it will soon be of the past — boys are helping to tear down the parapets to find bullets and they get lots of them…. We can locate the place where our gun stood all right, now there is a big house built within 100 feet of it and a road is graded right through the works between where we were.”

And now, of course, all that’s left is a neighborhood of houses, streets, and an adjoining medical center.

Posted in Fort Sanders, Nineteenth Ohio Battery | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Reprise: Honors for Gen. Sanders

In addition to having the earthwork the Rebels dubbed Fort Loudon named for him, Union Gen. William P. Sanders has had other honors since—including a curious juxtaposition of his historical marker with his onetime burial place.

“Knoxville’s Fort Sanders neighborhood and Fort Sanders Presbyterian Hospital, both of which are located on the site of the fort, are also named after him.

“In addition, the Sons of Union Veterans has a chapter in East Tennessee named in memory of ‘Colonel William P. Sanders.’ A historic marker on Kingston Pike denotes the location where he was mortally wounded.

“Ironically, the marker is on the property of Second Presbyterian Church, which relocated from downtown Knoxville to the place where William Sanders was hit.”

Posted in Fort Sanders, Gen. William P. Sanders, Knoxville | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The last Rebel unit to leave Richmond

THE FALL OF RICHMONDThere’s always been some dispute as to which Rebel unit was the last to depart Richmond during its evacuation on April 3-4, 1865. But for some there was never any doubt.

One who had no doubt was Captain D.B. Sanford of the Phillips Georgia Legion Infantry, subject of a separate chapter in the novel on its role in the attack on Fort Sanders.

Sanford wrote of the evacuation in Confederate Veteran magazine long after the war:

“There seems to be some dispute as to what soldiers or command of soldiers was the last to leave Richmond…My recollection is that Phillips’s Georgia Legion Infantry were the rear guard and the last soldiers to leave that city on that day.

“When this command crossed the [Mayo] bridge over the James River, the bridge was on fire in many places on each side, and we had to run with all our might and shinney from side to side of the bridge to keep from being burned to death.

“No other soldiers could have crossed this bridge after we did. This command left camp near Drury’s Bluff about twelve o’clock Sunday night, April 2, 1865, and reached Richmond a little after daylight Monday morning. I was captain of the Greene Rifles, Company A, Phillips’s Georgia Legion Infantry.”

But there was at least one other view, and it also concerns a unit that fought at Fort Sanders: Humphreys’ Mississippi Brigade of the 13th, 17th, 18th and 21st Mississippi regiments—the 13th and 17th being in the attack and the other two in sharpshooting support.

J.S. McNeilly, who claimed to be a veteran of the 13th Regiment (though his name appears in none of the accepted muster rolls), recalled for the Mississippi Historical Society long after the war that Humphreys’ brigade was the last through Richmond. He contended that it was April 4 and he also remembered the burning Mayo bridge over the James.

“A detail was made for suppression of the plunder and arson that was rife,” McNeilly wrote. “But the bridge across the James being set on fire prematurely, through error or design, the hindmost men had to double quick to avoid being cut off.

“It is a thing to be noted,” McNeilly added, ” that this brigade of Mississippians were the last of the Army of Northern Virginia to march through Richmond—the passing of their waving banners was the visible emblem of the fall of the Confederate capital.”

Which recollection is accurate? Both, but for a mix-up in recollected dates, or neither? Take your pick.

Posted in "Knoxville 1863", Confederate Veteran Magazine, The Phillips Georgia Legion | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment